您的位置 首页 双语新闻

马航飞机失联原因难于调查

Traditionally regarded as one of the safest planes in the skies, the Boeing777's reputation will have been damaged by the second fatal crash in less than ayear.波音777飞机一直被认为是最安全机型之一,但不到一年时间里发生

Traditionally regarded as one of the safest planes in the skies, the Boeing 777's reputation will have been damaged by the second fatal crash in less than a year.

波音777飞机一直被认为是最安全机型之一,但不到一年时间里发生第二起致命坠毁必然会使其名声受损。

There are around 1,000 Boeing 777s in service, and the plane is a long haul workhorse, plying some of the longest routes.

It entered service in 1995 and the National transportation Safety Board, which is responsible for monitoring US-made aircraft, has logged fewer than 60 incidents.

But the recent record has been more patchy(不调和的) with two major incidents - a crash at San Francisco airport last July, which claimed three lives, and the crash-landing of a British Airways 777 at Heathrow in January 2008.

But the Malaysian disaster is very different from both the BA incident and the crash involving a Asiana Airlines flight at San Francisco International Airport in July.

Both the BA and Asiana accidents occurred shortly before landing, while the Malaysia airlines plane disappeared off the radar during the early stages of the trip.

The accident at San Francisco in July was attributed to pilot error which led to the engines being set to idle because he believed the computer would maintain sufficient speed to keep the plane up in the air.

But initial reports suggest that Zaharie Ahmad Shah, the 53-year-old Malaysian airlines pilot, was hugely experienced - having joined the carrier in 1981 and with 18,365 hours in the cockpit under his belt.

The BA crash landing, which did not result in any fatalities, was finally found to have been caused by a blockage in the fuel line feeding the engine.

Simply put the aircraft had the aviation equivalent of a cardiac arrest because some of the fuel failed to melt and blocked the supply line at the end of a long flight from Beijing to London, during which the plane travelled through unusually cold airspace over Siberia.

This crash has echoes of the disaster in which 288 people on board an Air France Airbus 330. That plane, another long-haul workhorse, crashed into the Atlantic en-route from Rio de Janeiro in June 2009 killing 228 people.

A variety of explanations have been given for the Air France crash, with investigators finding that the plane's speed sensors were giving an incorrect reading.

But with this crash involving a different aircraft, it will take several months before investigators can ascertain the cause.

声明:凡注明来源为"简答网"的为本站原创作品,未经许可不得转载。其他部分内容转载自网络,如有侵犯您的合法权益,请与我们取得联系(邮箱:),以便及时处理。 转载请注明原文地址:https://www.jiandongshicai.cn/en/7393.html

马航飞机失联原因难于调查

下载Pdf文档到电脑,方便收藏和打印~

为您推荐

用户反馈
请选择反馈类型(可多选):
您的联系方式:(如需回复请填写联系方式)
反馈内容:
提交成功 小编会尽快处理
回到顶部
点击反馈